Binod Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27170 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -30 Year- 2017 Thana -ASARGANJ District- MUNGER ====================================================== Binod Yadav Son of Prikshan Yadav, Resident of Village- Navtoliya, Mirhatti, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vivekanand Vivek For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Asharganj P.S.Case No. 30 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and it appears that he has been made accused on the basis of his own confession and confessional statement of other co-accused.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except confessional statement there is nothing against the petitioner and there is no recovery and no Test Identification Parade was held and he is in custody for about four months having clean antecedent.

Heard learned APP also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27170 of 2017 (3) dt.17-07-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and also considering the fact that petitioner has criminal antecedents also, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.

However, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude the same within nine months. If trial is not concluded within the said period, petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

With the above observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U