Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14759/2026bail granted

Robin Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-12Mr. Justice Praveen Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14759 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-312 Year-2025 Thana- BHARGAMA District- Araria ====================================================== Robin Yadav S/O Shyam Nand Kumar @Shyamanand Yadav R/O VillageBelsara, P.S- Raniganj, Dist.- Araria. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Dheeraj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 312 of 2025 dated 09.09.2025, registered for the offence under Section 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, allegedly, from the possession of the petitioner a country made pistol was recovered and upon unloading the same, three live cartridges were also recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the provisions under Section 103 BNSS regarding search and seizure has not been followed. Petitioner is in custody since 08.09.2025. Although he has been made accused in 12 cases, but he on bail in almost all the cases and the charge-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14759 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026 2/2 sheet has been submitted in this case and there is no allegation of tampering.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody, let the, above named, petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 312 of 2025.

7. It is made clear that if the petitioner is involved subsequently in similar nature of cases, the prosecution would be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of bail. (Praveen Kumar, J) Pawan/- U T