← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8515/2021disposed

Babli Kumari v. The State Of Bihar,

2022-02-14Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8515 of 2021 ====================================================== Babli Kumari W/O - Sanni Kumar Resident of Village - Kubauli Ram, Ward No. - 05, P.O. - Kubauli Ram, P.S. - Bangra NH, Block - Pusa, DistrictSamastipur, PIN - 848131, State - Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar, Bihar.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, Integrated Child Development Services, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Divisional Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga. 5.

The District Magistrate, Samastipur.

6.

The District Programme Officer, ICDS, Social Welfare Department, Samastipur.

7.

The Child Development Programme Officer, Block - Pusa, DistrictSamastipur. 8.

The Female Supervisor - cum - Member Secretary, Ward No. -05, Village - Kubauli Ram, Gram Panchyat Raj Kubauli Ram, P.O. Kubauli Ram, P.S. - Bangra NH, Block - Pusa, District- Samastipur. 9.

The Chairman-cum- Ward Member, Ward No. - 05, Village - Kubauli Ram, Gram Panchyat Raj Kubauli Ram, P.O. - Kubauli Ram, P.S. - Bangra NH, Block - Pusa, District- Samastipur.

10.

Sushma Kumari W/O - Devesh Kumar Resident of Village - Kubauli Ram, Ward No. -05, P.O. - Kubauli Ram, P.S. - Bangra NH, Block - Pusa, DistrictSamastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nalin Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.S.K.Madal (SC-3) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL ORDER 14-02-2022 The matter is heard via video conferencing due to circumstances prevailing on account of the COVID-19 pandemic.

State counsel accept notice for respondent Nos.1 to 9. Service of notice to tenth respondent Sushma Kumari

Patna High Court CWJC No.8515 of 2021(2) dt.14-02-2022 2/2 is dispensed since no adverse order is passed against her in the present order.

The petitioner has already invoked remedy of appeal before the appellate authority. Therefore, the appellate authority is hereby directed to decide the petitioner's appeal after giving opportunity of hearing to petitioner and tenth respondent Sushma Kumari and decide the petitioner's appeal within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. (P. B. Bajanthri, J) Prakash Narayan /- U