Guddu Pandit @ Raj Kumar Raj v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12967 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-269 Year-2022 Thana- BARAHAT District- Banka ====================================================== GUDDU PANDIT @ RAJ KUMAR RAJ SON OF PRAMOD PANDIT R/O VILL.- PARBATTA, P.S.- BARAHAT, DISTT.- BANKA ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 19-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the learned court below.
As per the prosecution case, all the accused persons abused the informant and assaulted him by means of lathi & danda.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioner. He further submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12967 of 2023(2) dt.19-05-2023 2/2 there is admitted land dispute between the parties. He further submits that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.
Learned APP for the State opposes for prayer for bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the fact that there is no specific overt act against the petitioner, let the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court below, where the case is pending/Successor court, in connection with Barahat P.S. Case No.269/2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T