Sudama Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.29208 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -536 Year- 2016 Thana -FORBESGANJ District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Sudama Devi wrongly Described as Radha Dev W/o Sri Narayan Pandit Wrongly described as Shobhanand Pandit Village- Zimrahi, P.S. Narpatganj, District- Araria.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bishwajeet Singh Mr. Kundan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Rita Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 01-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Forbishganj P.S. Case No. 536 of 2016 dated 8.10.2016, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 418, 419, 420, 406, 379,323, 504, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation levelled is that the informant had purchased certain land in the name of his mother Kashiya Devi, totalling to 44 1⁄2 decimal and had got the same registered with the registrar office, however, in the year 2016 when the informant had gone to deposit land revenue, he was handed over a receipt for land appertaining to 40 decimals instead of 44 1⁄2 decimal of land. Then the informant is said to have enquired about the matter and he came to know that one Radha Devi has impersonated herself as
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29208 of 2017 (2) dt.01-07-2017 2/2 daughter of said Most Kashia Devi and got executed a sale deed in her favour. Upon enquiry it was found that there was no such person in the name of Radh Devi in that village and she was none else but the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant matter is purely of a civil nature. The petitioner has no concern either with Kashiya Devi or the informant. It is further submitted that the petitioner is accused in one another case, which has been instituted by the father-in-law of the informant and the same has been compromised and as such the petitioner is on bail in that case. It has been further submitted that the petitioner is in jail custody since 10.04.2017.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it fit and proper to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail.
Accordingly, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Forbisganj P.S. Case No. 536 of 2016. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) BTiwary/- U T