← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14857/2026allowed

Vishal Kumar Chaubey @ Vishal Kumar @ Vishal Chaubey v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-15Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14857 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-139 Year-2025 Thana- MANJHAGARH District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Vishal Kumar Chaubey @ Vishal Kumar @ Vishal Chaubey S/o Sanjay Chaubey R/o Village- Jokaha, P.S- Barauli, Distt.- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Saurabh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Shashwat Sahil Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 15-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No.139 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1) & 3(5) of the BNS.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that three persons have stabbed the brother of the informant due to which he died.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the FIR it is clear that co-accused Sunil Kumar is the main accused. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the name of this petitioner has surfaced during investigation. He was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14857 of 2026(3) dt.15-04-2026 2/3 remanded in this case from other case and police have extracted his confessional statement. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that save and except confessional statement there is nothing against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that main thrust of allegation is against Sunil Kumar and a land dispute was also with Sunil Kumar. This petitioner has got no motive. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that similarly situated co-accused Jishan Ali has been granted bail by the learned Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 79058 of 2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 19.06.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State but he has conceded that main thrust of allegation is against Sunil Kumar.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14857 of 2026(3) dt.15-04-2026 3/3 District and Additional Sessions Judge-VII, Gopalganj in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No.139 of 2025. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T