Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13851/2025dismissed

Mamta Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-23Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13851 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2024 Thana- CHANDRAMANDI District- Jamui ====================================================== Mamta Devi W/o Binod Kumar Paswan R/o vill - Simra, P.S.- Chandramandih, Distt.- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

The State Of Bihar Village-Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar Shrivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Chandramandih P.S. Case No. 200 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 137(2), 103(1), 283, 3(5) of the BNS.

3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner was having an affair with the deceased. She called the deceased on 25.10.2024 at 9:00 P.M. at her house and when he reached the house of the petitioner, her father-in-law one Rajendra Paswan, Niraj Kumar and Naresh Kumar attacked him with an Axe and killed him and thereafter they all disposed of the body of the deceased under a bridge.

4. The petitioner is in custody since 28.10.2024.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13851 of 2025(4) dt.23-07-2025 2/3

5. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner had not played any role in the killing of the deceased and it is her father-in-law Rajendra Paswan, Niraj Kumar and Naresh Kumar who have killed the deceased.

6. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the application of the petitioner for grant of bail and has submitted that the petitioner may not be granted bail as the deceased was called by the petitioner and thereafter he has been killed by the other accused persons. He further submits that the petitioner, in her self-inculpatory statement, has described the modusoperandi of the offence that she has conspired with Rajendra Paswan and others in killing of the deceased and after killing him they have disposed of his body.

7. Learned counsel for the State further submits that the charge-sheet has been submitted in this case.

8. Considering the fact that the petitioner and others are accused of killing the deceased by calling him, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

9. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

10. The trial Court is directed to frame the charges and proceed with the trial expeditiously.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13851 of 2025(4) dt.23-07-2025 3/3

11. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Principal and District Sessions Judge, Jamui through FAX for its compliance.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U