Lal Baboo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12879 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2019 Thana- MAKHDUMPUR District- Jehanabad ====================================================== LAL BABOO YADAV Son of Rambali Yadav Resident of Village - Dhindhor Bigha, P.S. - Makhdumpur, District - Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms.Lilawati Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Lalan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 08-07-2020 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State through video conferencing.
Petitioner is in jail custody since 4.12.2019 in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 169/2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act Petitioner happens to be the husband of the deceased, who died within seven years of her marriage in other than normal circumstance. The informant claims that after marriage, deceased was subjected to cruelty and harassment by her husband and other in-laws on account of non fulfillment of illegal demand.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12879 of 2020(3) dt.08-07-2020 2/2 Submission on behalf of the petitioner is that the petitioner is labourer and works at Gujrat. Learned counsel of the petitioner, further, submits that the deceased pressurized the petitioner to take her to Gujarat and when petitioner refused to take the deceased to Gujarat, the deceased consumed poison, as a result of which, she died. He, further, submits that in course of investigation, the Investigating Officer also learnt that quarrel had taken place between the petitioner and deceased and, thereafter, the deceased consumed poison. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail.
Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected.
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) Spd/- U T