Aditya Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12059 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-170 Year-2024 Thana- KARJA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Aditya Choudhary S/O Ram Prakash Choudhary R/O Village- Mahmada, P.SBaruraj, Distt.- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Brij Nandan Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Karja P.S. Case No. 170 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution story, on the alleged date of occurrence, the petitioner and other accused persons are alleged to have kidnapped the daughter of the informant for the purpose of marriage.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. There is delay of five days in lodging the F.I.R. He
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12059 of 2025(3) dt.12-05-2025 2/2 further submits that the victim girl has refused for medical examination. The petitioner has clean antecedent and he is in custody since 21.07.2024.
5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that from the statement of the victim recorded u/s 183 BNS, it would appear that she has supported the entire occurrence of kidnapping and subsequently establishing physical relationship forcibly with her by the petitioner.
6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and considering the statement of the victim recorded u/s 183 of the BNS, the prayer for regular bail stands rejected.
7. The petitioner may renew his prayer for regular bail after evidence of victim recorded in the trial court. (S. B. Pd. Singh, J) Ranjeet/- U T