Sonu Sharma @ Sumit Kumar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12435 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2025 Thana- MUSRIGHRARI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Sonu Sharma @ Sumit Kumar Sharma, S/O Virendra Sharma @ Virendra Kumar Ray @ Nanki Sharma, R/O Village- Morba Ray Tol, P.SMusarigharari, Distt.- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 121(1), 121(2), 132, 262, 352 and 351(2) of BNS.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the police has gone to execute the non bailable warrant issued against the petitioner who was accused in G.R. Case No. 269/09. It is alleged that when the police reached there, five persons started protesting the arrest of the petitioner and they became violent and attacked the police with lathi, rod, sword etc.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12435 of 2026(3) dt.08-04-2026 2/2 counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the only allegation against the petitioner is that he fled away. He has not assaulted any person. It has further been submitted that police has received simple injury. It has also been submitted that co-accused Keshav Kumar has been granted bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 12890 of 2026. The case of this petitioner stands on better footing. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 12.12.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail and has submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of eleven cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Musrigharari P.S. Case No. 200 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T