Pintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12036 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-131 Year-2024 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Pintu Kumar Son of Sunil Paswan Resident of Village - Kurmain, P.S. - Obra, District -Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mrs. Mukul Kumari, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 13-05-2025 Heard Mrs. Mukul Kumari, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP representing the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 131 of 2024, G.R. No. 817 of 2024 for the offence under Sections 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code, lodged on 25.03.2024 by the informant, Anil Singh.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that his minor daughter went missing and later came to know that she was called by a mobile no. XXXX868739 and an information came that the daughter is with him as the mobile got disconnected. Subsequently, the victim girl was recovered and as per her statement under section 164 of the Cr.P.C. she moved with the boy to Dehri then to Chennai. Though earlier he wanted to marry her, later the parents took him away after
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12036 of 2025(3) dt.13-05-2025 2/3 leaving at her Kurmaran whereafter she returned to Obra.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that both were in relationship, the parents put spoke in the wheels as the girl was minor, no kidnapping took place as per the statement.
5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail submitting that the girl is minor.
6. Taking into account the aforesaid facts as also the statement of the victim girl, no wrong has been attributed to him, as per statement, she went to Chennai and came back, the petitioner shall be facing the trial, in that background, this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 131 of 2024, G.R. No. 817 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C., as also with the following conditions:- (i) one of the bailor should be the family member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12036 of 2025(3) dt.13-05-2025 3/3 document to show his/her bona fide;
(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/her bail bond by the Trial Court itself;
(iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned police station every fortnight for next six months to mark his attendance;
(iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;
(v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds. (Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U T