Brijnandan Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.1758 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -3 Year- 2016 Thana -SC/ST District- AURANGABAD ======================================================
1. Brijnandan Singh, Son of Late Kariman Singh, @ Kariban Singh, resident of Village- Manika, P.S. Madanpur, District- Aurangabad. .... .... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Leelawati Kumari For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-07-2017 Heard the parties.
The appellant seeks regular bail in connection with S.C. S.T. P.S. Case No.03 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Section 341, 323 & 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(x) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Act) Act.
Allegation against the appellant is abusing the informant by taking caste name and also assaulting by stick. Submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is that he has been falsely implicated in this case and earlier also he was on police bail. The appellant is in custody for about two months.
Heard learned Special P.P. also.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1758 of 2017 (3) dt.17-07-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides in view of the above facts and circumstances, this appeal is allowed.
Let the appellant above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000 (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.,- Vth, Aurangabad in connection with Aurangabad S.C. S.T. P.S.Case No.03 of 2016 dated 20.2.2016 after setting aside order dated 30.5.2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-Ist-cum-Special Judge, Aurangabad in connection with S.C. S.T. P.S.Case No.03 of 2016 dated 20.2.2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the appellant shall be local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The appellant will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The appellant shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court concerned and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T