← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13859/2025bail granted

Abid @ Abid Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-12Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13859 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-237 Year-2024 Thana- DAGARUA District- Purnia ====================================================== Abid @ Abid Hussain Son of Late Jakir Resident of Buari Ward No.2, P.S. - Dagaria, District - Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md Fazle Karim For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit Mr. Viveka Nandsingh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-05-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 127(1),115(2),76,303(2),109,352,351(2) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is own uncle of the informant. It is further submitted that petitioner has no dispute with the informant with regard to property rather informant has property dispute with another uncle of his, whose name is Abdul Hafiz. It is further submitted that since petitioner did not side with the informant in his dispute with Abdul Hafiz, as such, he came to be implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13859 of 2025(3) dt.12-05-2025 2/2 submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that specific allegation of assault is against Md. Hafiz and Faizan. As far as this petitioner is concerned, the allegation against him is general and omnibus in nature.

4. Learned counsel for the informant as well as learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application, but then, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant fairly submits that there is no specific allegation of assault against this petitioner.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Purnea in connection with Dagarua P. S. Case No.237 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

6. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T