← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7675/2018bail granted

Karu Marandi v. The State Of Bihar

2018-02-07Mr. Justice Prakash Chandra Jaiswal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7675 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-292 Year-2016 Thana- JHAJHA District- Jamui ====================================================== Karu Marandi, Son of Joriya Marandi, resident of Village Kenduatanr, Jaratanr, P.S. Jhajha, Dist.- Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prabhat Ranjan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Fahimuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER 07-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 292 of 2016 registered under Sections 121, 121A, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Sections 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 of UAP Act.

The petitioner along with other accused persons are said to have assembled to make plan for attacking the police patrolling party and blowing it by hurling bomb. On the tip off, the police arrived at the place of occurrence and on giving chase, petitioner was apprehended and one revolver and one live cartridge were recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7675 of 2018(2) dt.07-02-2018 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. No incriminating article has been recovered from his conscious physical possession. Though, the petitioner has been remanded in two other cases but out of which he is on bail in one case. Earlier, the bail petition of the petitioner was rejected by this Court with liberty to the petitioner to renew the same, if the trial is not concluded within four months. But despite framing the charge in the case, no witness has been produced by the prosecution up-till now. The petitioner has been languishing in custody since 23.12.2016.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-1st, Jamui in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 292 of 2016.

(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J) rohit/- U T