Raju Kumar Singh @ Raju Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16294 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -231 Year- 2014 Thana -CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- SARAN ====================================================== Raju Kumar Singh @ Raju Singh, Son of Late Bhuneshwar Singh, resident of village- Gheghta, P.S.- Chapra Mufassil, District- Saran .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Ajit Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 28-05-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 323, 341/5-4, 307 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering that there is a counter version of the occurrence as also the genesis of the same and the fair antecedent of the Petitioner, let the Petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order in connection with Chapra Mufassil P.S. Case No. 231 of 2014 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chapra, Saran, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also conditions (a) That one of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16294 of 2015 (2) dt.28-05-2015 2/2 bailor will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the Petitioner.

(b) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail, (c) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse (d) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (e) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J.) Vats/- U T