Md. Akramul Haq v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.5179 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -690 Year- 2015 Thana -COMPLAINT CASE District- SUPAUL ====================================================== Md. Akramul Haq son of Md. Islam, .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Bibi Asmina D/o. Md. Maksud, .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/323/341/379/504 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act.
This is a case under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is husband and there is allegation of demand of dowry and torture for the same.
The record reveals that other matrimonial cases are also going before the learned Principal Judge, Family Court. Notice was personally served on opposite party No.2 but she has chosen not to appear in this case.
Considering the future chance of settlement, let the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5179 of 2017 (4) dt.21-06-2017 2/2 petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul/Successor Court in connection with Complaint Case No.690C of 2015, corresponding to Cri. Comp (P) No.672 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. With further condition that petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation and trial of the case, failing which the Court-below shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail-bonds of the petitioner in this case.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T