← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3525/2023disposed

Ramshreshth Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2023-06-19Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3525 of 2023 ====================================================== Ramshreshth Paswan Son of Late Chulhai Paswan, Resident of VillageSonai, P.S.- Khirhar, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Examination Controller Bihar School Examination Board, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Principal, Kali Das Vidyapathi Science College, Uchchaith, Benipatti, District- Madhubani.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the BSEB :

Mr.Amrendra Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Nishant Kumar Jha, Ac to SC-28 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 19-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Bihar School Examination Board. Petitioner, in the present case, is seeking a direction commanding the respondents to enter his name in the computer database of the Bihar School Examination Board, Patna (Intermediate Council) in the year 1987. It is his further prayer that a mandamus be issued to the respondents for providing second copy of the original certificate and marksheet of Intermediate to the petitioner after entering the name of the petitioner in the computer database of the Bihar School Examination Board, Patna (Intermediate Council). Learned counsel for the Bihar Bihar School

Patna High Court CWJC No.3525 of 2023(2) dt.19-06-2023 2/2 Examination Board, Patna submits that for getting a duplicate marksheet, a candidate has to make application with requisite fee with the Board and only thereafter the Board will take steps for issuance of a duplicate certificate. It is pointed out that in the writ application there is no averment that the petitioner ever applied with requisite fee.

In the aforesaid view of the matter, this writ application is being disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to apply for duplicate certificate giving his correct roll number and roll code etc. with requisite fee whereupon his request shall be considered by the Board within a period of four weeks from the date of making of the application with requisite fee. This Writ Application stands disposed of accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rajeev/- U