Pankaj Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11391 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-231 Year-2018 Thana- AIRPORT District- Patna ====================================================== Pankaj Ram, aged about 18 years (Male), son of Late Shri Prasad Ram, Resident of Village - Paludha, P.S.- Chenari, Distt - Rohtas at Sasaram. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Alok Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kalyan Shankar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 26-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Hawai Adda P.S. Case No. 231 of 2018, registered for the offence under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation has been made that the petitioner has tried to obtain the employment on compassionate ground on the basis of forged certificate of his experience. Considering the age of the petitioner as has been stated about 18 years and also the fact that the petitioner has a widow mother, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, let the petitioner, namely, Pankaj Ram, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11391 of 2019(2) dt.26-02-2019 2/2 learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Hawai Adda P.S. Case no. 231 of 2018 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Further condition is that whenever the police will call the petitioner for the purposes of investigation and interrogation, he will remain present for the investigation. In the event of being absent on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the present order will be treated to have been cancelled. This is also subject to the condition that if the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found involved in similar nature of case, then the cornered Court below would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U T