Raja Ram Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11982 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2019 Thana- NIMACHANDPURA District- Begusarai ====================================================== RAJA RAM SAH Son of Guddar Sah Resident of Village - Balha, P.S. - Dandari, District - Begusarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 411, 412, 413, 414 and 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
A stolen motorcycle was recovered from possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no material to substantiate that the petitioner is going to tamper with the evidence or abscond the process of law. Considering the facts aforesaid, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail, after framing of the charge against the petitioner, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Neemachandpura Police Station
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11982 of 2020(2) dt.28-02-2020 2/2 Case No. 77 of 2019, subject to the following conditions:- (a) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (b) Both the bailors shall be resident of the territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.
(c) The petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the learned trial court.
The trial court is directed to expedite the framing of the charge against the petitioner.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T