← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8603/2015dfd for non appearance

Baijnath Prasad Mehta @ Baijnath Prasad Mahto @ Baijnath Mahto v. The Authorized Officer Cum Chief Manager Corporation Bank And ORS

2023-08-16Mr. Justice A. Abhishek Reddy1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8603 of 2015 ====================================================== Baijnath Prasad Mehta @ Baijnath Prasad Mahto @ Baijnath Mahto S/o- Late Harkishun Mehta @ Harikishun Mahto @ Harikrishna Mahto, resident of Mohalla- Bari Nagia, Patna City, P.S.- Malsalami, District- Patna... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The Authorized Officer Cum Chief Manager Corporation Bank Indra Bhawan, Boring Canal Road, Patna- 800001 2.

The Corporation Bank through its Manager, Indra Bhawan, Boring Canal Road, Patna- 800001 3.

The Branch Manager, the Corporation Bank, Indra Bhawan, Boring Canal Road, Patna- 800001 4.

M/s Ashirvad Hosiery, 95 E, S.K. Puri, Road No. 3, Rajesh Path, Boring Road- Patna- 800001 5.

Ashis Kumar, S/o- Vachaspati, resident of 301, Vimla Apartment, Justice Narayan Path, Boring Road, Patna 6.

Ramesh Shukla S/o- Chandeshwar Shukla, resident of Mohalla- Begampur, Patnacity, P.S.- Chowk, District- Patna- 800009 7.

The Debt Recovery Tribunal, Patna through its Recovery officer, Patna 8.

The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad represented through its Registrar, the Debt Recovery Appellante Tribunal, Allahabad ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

None For the Respondents :

Mr.Manish Kishore, Adv .

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 16-08-2023 The matter was called on 27.06.2023, 11.07.2023 and 19.07.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the counsel for the petitioner.

2. Even today, when the matter is called out, there is no representation on behalf of the counsel for the petitioner.

3. It appears that the counsel for the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present writ petition.

4. Having regard to the same, the writ petition is dismissed for default.

(A. Abhishek Reddy , J) Shamshad/- U