Preety Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14617 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-531 Year-2024 Thana- GAUTAMBUDHNAGAR DistrictSiwan ====================================================== 1.
Preety Kumari W/O Anmol Kumar Resident of Village- Chari, P.S- Gautam Buddh Nagar, Distt.- Siwan.
2.
Poonam Kumari W/O Uday Shankar Resident of Village- Chari, P.SGautam Buddh Nagar, Distt.- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Parmanand Prasad, APP For the Informant :
Mr. Naresh Prasad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-07-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 117(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..
3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that these petitioners assaulted informant and his mother by means of lathi as a result of which they sustained injuries.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, petitioners have
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14617 of 2025(4) dt.08-07-2025 2/2 falsely been implicated in this case due to land dispute between the parties. There are general and omnibus allegations. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners and submitted that petitioners are named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that they assaulted informant and his mother as a result of which they sustained injuries. Doctor has found the injuries grievous in nature.
6. Considering the specific and direct nature of accusation and nature of injuries sustained by the injured, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T