← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18310/2015bail granted

Jitendra Ram v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2015-06-25Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18310 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -513 Year- 2011 Thana -BHOJPUR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictBHOJPUR ====================================================== Jitendra Ram, Son of Ram Prasad Ram @ Mehi Lal Ram, resident of village - Kakan Dihra, Police Station - Pawana, Sandesh, District - Bhojpur at Ara.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Rekha Devi, Wife of Jitendra Ram, resident of village - Kakan Dihra, Police Station - Sandesh, District - Bhojpur at Ara. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER ------------- 25-06-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.513 (C) of 2011 registered under Sections 323, 379 and 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code besides Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

The allegation against all the accused persons including the petitioner, who is the husband of the complainant (opposite party no.2), is of torturing the complainant (opposite party no.2) for non fulfillment of the dowry demand and ousting her from the matrimonial house.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18310 of 2015 (3) dt.25-06-2015 2/2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is still ready to keep the complainant (opposite party no.2) with full honour and dignity. In fact, the complainant (opposite party no.2) herself is not ready to lead her conjugal life with the petitioner, which would appear from the order dated 19.09.2014 passed in ABP No.896 of 2014 by the Sessions Judge, Ara, whereby the prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail has been dismissed.

Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender by him within six weeks, be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara, in connection with Complaint Case No.513 (C) of 2011, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T