Ranjeet Roy v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14379 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2021 Thana- JANTA BAZAR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Ranjeet Roy, Son Of Rajendra Rai R/O Village- Kateya, P.S.- Janta Bazar, District- Saran At Chapra 2.

Pintu Rai @ Pintu Kumar Rai, Son Of Rajendra Rai R/O Village- Kateya, P.S.- Janta Bazar, District- Saran At Chapra ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State through video conferencing.

The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 308, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 24.03.2021 at 10.00 A.M., a Panchayati was held for a previous land dispute for which, Rs.Two lacs had to be given by Rajendra Rai in May, 2021 and only signatures had to be taken when it is alleged that all the seven accused persons including the petitioners started abusing the informant to which, the informant objected when petitioner nos.1 and 2 assaulted Shtrudhan Rai on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14379 of 2022(2) dt.16-09-2022 2/2 head causing injury.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. It is next submitted that the F.I.R. does not disclose that by what weapon Shatudhan Rai was assaulted on head. It is also submitted that injuries suffered is simple in nature which clearly demonstrates that petitioners had no intention of committing any serious crime as the blow was not even repeated.

Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bailbonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Janta Bazar P. S. Case No.67 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T