Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.24882 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -104 Year- 2014 Thana -MURLIGANJ District- MADHEPURA ====================================================== Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Kumar Yadav S/o Suresh Yadav, R/o Vill.- Manikpur, P.S.- Sour Bazar (Patharghat O.P.), District- Saharsa. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Fahimuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 03-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 21.12.2017 in connection with Murliganj P.S. Case No.104 of 2014 for the offences alleged under Sections 395, 397 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated merely on the basis of confessional statement of coaccused Prince Kumar. There is no other material to connect the petitioner in the alleged crime. Other co-accused has been granted regular bail. There is no recovery from the possession of the petitioner and he has not been put on T.I. Parade.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24882 of 2018 (2) dt.03-05-2018 2/2 named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount leach to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura, in connection with Murliganj P.S. case No.104 of 2014, on the following conditions :

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Vikash Jain, J) N.H./- U T