Pramod Sharma @ Pankaj v. State Of Bihar And ANR
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18462 of 2015 (3) dt.02-07-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.18462 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1292 Year- 2013 Thana -ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== PRAMOD SHARMA @ PANKAJ, SON OF LATE TARNI PRASAD SHARMA, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA - KALI TAJIA, BEKAPUR, P.S. - KOTWALI, DISTRICT- MUNGER.
.... .... PETITIONER/S
VERSUS
1. THE STATE OF BIHAR
2. PRIYANKA SHARMA WIFE OF PROAMOD SHARMA ALIAS PANKAJ, DAUGHTER OF LATE P.N. VISHAKARMA MOHALLAKANSSARAI, NEAR DURGA MANDIR ADHE ROAD SASARAM , DISTRICT- ROHTAS.
.... .... OPPOSITE PARTY/S ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tarkeshwar Pd. Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 02-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 1292 of 2013 registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
The accusation is of torturing of complainant, Priyanka Sharma, by her husband and in-laws for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is the husband of the complainant, whose marriage was performed in the year 2007 with the complainant and out of the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18462 of 2015 (3) dt.02-07-2015 wedlock there is one female child. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is ready to keep the complainant (opposite party no. 2) with full dignity and honour. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on provisional bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Trial No. 2200 of 2014 arising out of Complaint Case No. 1292 of 2013, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
Learned trial court is directed to issue notice to the complainant (opposite party no. 2) and make attempt to resolve the dispute in between the petitioner and the complainant (opposite party no.2) by taking all possible efforts and if the dispute is resolved them confirm the provisional bail of the petitioner. If the dispute is not resolved then the trial court will pass the order on its own merit.
Accordingly, this application is disposed of. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T