Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16126/2015disposed

Sanoj Kumar @ Saroj Kumar Yadav v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2015-04-29Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16126 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -11 Year- 2014 Thana -AURANGABAD COMPLAINT CASE DistrictAURANGABAD ====================================================== Sanoj Kumar @ Saroj Kumar Yadav, S/o Suraj lal Singh @ Bhuj Lal Yadav, R/o Village Dilawarpur, P.S. Haspura, District Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Rinku Kumari W/o Sanoj Kumar @ Saroj Kumar Yadav R/o Village Dilawarpur, P.S. Haspura, District Aurangabad (Bihar). .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Santosh Chandra Bhaskar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar No. 2, A..P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 29-04-2015 Heard both sides.

The petitioner is the husband, who apprehends his arrest in Complaint Case No. 11/14 under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to keep his wife. The marriage was solemnized in the year 2004 and after ten year of marriage, the present case was filed only on account of some family dispute. Considering the facts aforesaid, the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, is directed to be enlarged on provisional bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16126 of 2015 (2) dt.29-04-2015 2/2 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Daudnagar, Aurangabad (Bihar) in Complaint Case No. 11 of 2014.

The court below shall make all efforts for reconciliation of the dispute between the husband and the wife. If the dispute is resolved between the parties, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed. In case the dispute is not resolved, the court below shall pass orders on the prayer for provisional bail of the petitioner on its own merit in accordance with law.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Dilip/- U T