← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15531/2018bail granted

Sanjit Malakar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2018-03-21Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15531 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -434 Year- 2015 Thana -COMPLAINT CASE District- SUPAUL ======================================================

1. Sanjit Malakar, Son of Late Jay Kant Malakar, resident of VillageHanuman Nagar, Police Station- Sour Bazar, District- Saharsa. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Sita Devi, wife of Sanjit Malakar, resident of Village- Hanuman Nagar, Police Station- Sour Bazar, District- Saharsa, Daughter of Late Shiv Narayan Malakar, resident of Village- Hirday Nagar, P.S. Birpur, DistrictSupaul. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Navin Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case registered under Section-498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15531 of 2018 (2) dt.21-03-2018 petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Birpur, Supaul in connection with Complaint Case No. 434 C of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V./- U T