← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5485/2020disposed

Ganesh Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

2022-10-10The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5485 of 2020 ====================================================== Ganesh Pandey (Male) aged about 73 years, Son of Late Pradeep Pandey resident of Shivpur, Shivpur, P.S.- Shahpur, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Energy Department, Govt. of Bihar.

2.

The General Manager, Power Grid Corporation, Moryalok Complex, Patna. 3.

The Dy. General Manager, Power Grid Corporation, Moryalok Complex, Patna.

4.

The District Magistrate, Bhojpur, Bihar.

5.

The Circle Officer, Bihiya, Bhojpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Karn, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Abbas Haider, SC 6 For the Respondent 6 and 7 :

Mr. Harendra Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Power Grid Corporation :

Mr. Arbind Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 10-10-2022 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- "1. That by way of this writ petition petitioner seeks indulgence by this Hon'ble Court for issuance of appropriate writ/ order/ direction/ directions to the respondents to restrain them for installing power grid electric tower of 220000 volt on the residential land of the petitioner which is situated in the residential area which is not only

Patna High Court CWJC No.5485 of 2020(2) dt.10-10-2022 2/2 hazardous for the life of the people, that too is being installed without proper acquisition of land and without making any compensation to the petitioner.

Further for issuance of writ/order/direction for which the petitioner is found to be entitle too in the facts and circumstances of this case."

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that, in view of the intervening developments, the present petition has become infructuous.

In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.

Interlocutory application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Satyavrat Verma, J) K.C.Jha/- P.Kumar U