← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13269/2022bail granted

Raviranjan Kumar @ Kundan Kumar @ Kundan v. The State Of Bihar

2022-07-15Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13269 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2021 Thana- GAUTAMBUDHNAGAR DistrictSiwan ====================================================== Raviranjan Kumar @ Kundan Kumar @ Kundan, Son Of Satendra Prasad Resident Of Village- Janki Nagar, P.S.- G.B. Nagar, District- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Asha Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 34, 36, 38 and 41(i) of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the allegation is of recovery of 91.920 litre of liquor from a car. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated by alleging that he is driver of the vehicle when the petitioner is neither owner, nor the driver of the vehicle. It is next submitted that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession. It is also submitted that it appears that in order to save the real culprit, the petitioner came to be falsely

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13269 of 2022(2) dt.15-07-2022 2/2 implicated by alleging in the F.I.R. that his name was disclosed by the local people, but the F.I.R. is completely silent, who were the people, which disclosed the name of the petitioner, which amply demonstrates that the implication of the petitioner is false.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the anticipatory bail application.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the fact that the petitioner is a man of clean antecedent, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with G. B. Nagar P. S. Case No.104 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T