Patna High CourtC. REV./65/2016dismissed

Upendra Kumar Singh v. The Union Of India Through The G.M., Southern Eastern Rly, Grc Kolkatta And ORS

2016-12-07Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra,Mr. Justice Samarendra Pratap Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.65 of 2016 In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 2249 of 2014 ====================================================== Upendra Kumar Singh son of late Suresh Prasad Singh R/o Lal Makan Mainpura, P.S.

Pataliputra, District Patna A/p posted as SSE/Works/Rourkela .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Union of India through the G.M., Southern Eastern Rly, GRC Kolkatta-43, West Bengal.

2. Radhe Shyam, The General Manager, Southern Eastern Railway, GRC. Kolkatta-43, West Bengal.

3. Sri B.N. Soren, Sr. Divisional Personal Officer, S.E. Railway, CKP Division, Distt. Singhbhoom, Jharkhand.

4. Sri Raghvendra Sarswat, Sr. Divisional Engineer (Cord), CKP, S.E. Railway, CKP, Division, Distt. Singhbhoom, Jharkhand.

5. Sri Indiresh Kumar, Divisional Engineer (West), CKP, S.E. Railway, CKP, Division, Distt. Singhbhoom, Jharkhand.

6. Sri Kalicharran Sao, Assistant, Divisional Engineer, S.E. Rly, Raurkela, Qr. No. D/1Spl., Rly. Colony, Near Bara Park, District Sundargarh, Orissa.

7. Sri Rajiv Agrawal, D.R.M/CKP Distt. Singhbhoom, Jharkhand.

8. Sri Navin Talbar, A.D.R.M/CKP Distt. Singhbhoom, Jharkhand. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rewti Kant Raman For the Respondent/s : Mr. D.K. Sinha, Sr. Advocate Mr. Anil Singh.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH) 07-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the review petitioner as well as counsel for the respondents.

The petitioner has filed the instant application for

Patna High Court C. REV. No.65 of 2016 (4) dt.07-12-2016 2/2 reviewing the order dated 05.01.2015 passed in M.J.C. No. 2249 of 2014 arising out of C.W.J.C. No.8945 of 2014. We find no ground to review the earlier order dated 05.01.2015, since there is no error apparent on the record. This Court has already granted necessary liberty to the petitioner in paragraph-5 of the contempt application.

In view of the above, the Review Application is dismissed.

(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J) (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Shailendra/- U