← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16260/2019dismissed

Harnu Mehta @ Hari Narayan Mehta v. The State Of Bihar

2019-05-02Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16260 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-309 Year-2018 Thana- RANIGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== HARNU MEHTA @ HARI NARAYAN MEHTA Son of Padum Lal Mehta Resident of Village - Madhulata, P.S.- Raniganj, District - Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ramesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sangeeta Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 02-05-2019 This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Raniganj P.S. Case No. 309/18, disclosing offences under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner and others is that while the husband of the informant had gone along with one Yoganand Mehta for grazing the cattle, the accused persons including appellant came and assaulted the husband of the informant and Yoganand Mehta causing death of husband of the informant.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that no specific allegation has been attributed to the petitioner rather only general and omnibus allegation has been attributed to the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the State as well as informant

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16260 of 2019(3) dt.02-05-2019 2/2 opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the Yoganand Mehta, who also received injury in the occurrence has supported the case of prosecution and has named the accused persons and two injuries were found on the person of the deceased. Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances as well as the nature of accusation, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner rather petitioner should surrender before the court below and make prayer for regular bail and if any such application is filed, the court below will dispose of on the basis of materials available on record, without being prejudiced by this order.

This application is, accordingly, dismissed (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T