Patna High CourtCR. MISC./3116/2018rejected

Bhim Kumar Singh @ Ajay Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2018-03-07Mr. Justice Arun Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3116 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -481 Year- 2017 Thana -DEHRI TOWN District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Bhim Kumar Singh @ Ajay Kumar Singh, S/o Yugal Singh, resident of Village- Katar, P.S.- Indrapuri, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lallan Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ramchandra Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection with Dehri (Indrapuri) P. S. Case No. 481 of 2017, registered under Sections 324, 307, 323, 302 and 120 (B) of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation in brief is that the petitioner and three other accused persons stabbed the informant's daughter with knife as a result of which, she succumbed to injuries.

Learnedcounselfor the petitioner submits that the informant does not appear to be eye witness because occurrence is said to have taken place at 3 A.M. and there was no any sourceof light for

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3116 of 2018 (4) dt.07-03-2018 2/2 for identification. Moreover in the Post Mortem report, the cause of death is shock and hemorrhage due to multiple injury caused by hard and blunt object.

Learned counsel for the State submits that the specific allegation against the petitioner is of assaulting the deceased with knife and deep cut injury out of three injuries, is found on the neck.

Having considered the said facts and circumstances, the prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected at this stage.

The trial court is directed to expedite the trial preferably in a year, if it does not conclude within that period, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

(Arun Kumar, J) Sudha/- U T