Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11582/2018rejected

Akhilesh Kumar @ Bitu And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2018-02-28Mr. Justice Arun Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.11582 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-961 Year-2017 Thana- DEHRI TOWN District- Rohtas ======================================================

1. Akhilesh Kumar @ Bitu, Son of Kishun Choudhary @ Shri Kishan Choudhary, Resident of Village Jhabarmal Gali, P.O. and P.S. Dehri-on-Sone, District Rohtas (Bihar).

2. Raju Kumar @ Raj Kumar, Son of Shri Pramod Singh, Resident of Mohalla Anikat, Dehri-on-Sone, P.O. and P.S. Dehri-on-Sone, District Rohtas (Bihar)

3. Chandan Kumar, Son of Late Bhuti Soni, Resident of Mohalla Nil Kothi, Dehri, P.O. and P.S. Dehri, District Rohtas (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. SRI SUNIL KUMAR PANDEY ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.

Petitioners, already in custody, seek bail in connection with Dehri (T) P.S. Case No.961 of 2017, registered under Sections 392/414 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the FIR was lodged after delay of 23 days, the petitioners were apprehended falsely; whereas learned APP for the State submits that the petitioners were found in possession of the stolen motorcycle and apprehended with the same.

Having considered the said facts and circumstances, the prayer of bail of the petitioners, at present, is rejected in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11582 of 2018(2) dt.28-02-2018 2/2 connection with Dehri (T) P.S. Case No.961 of 2017, pending in the court of learned SDJM, Dehri, District Rohtas. However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial and preferably conclude the same within six months from the date of framing of the charge.

(Arun Kumar, J) S.KUMAR/- U T