Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10122/2016rejected

Chandra Bhushan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2016-05-12Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10122 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -123 Year- 2012 Thana -RASULPUR District- SARAN ====================================================== Chandra Bhushan Singh S/o late Parshuram Singh Resident of VillageNainpura , P.s Panchrukhi District Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. B.P.Pandey, Sr.Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Umesh Lal Verma, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 12-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Rasulpur P.S. Case No.123/12 arising out of Complaint Case No.2312 of 2012 for the offences under Sections 302, 201 and 120(B) of the I.P.C.

Earlier prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 03.11.2015 passed in Cr.Misc.No.46001 of 2015. The present application renewing the anticipatory bail has been made stating that there are certain changed circumstances which entitles the petitioner to be considered for anticipatory bail.

Learned Sr.counsel appearing for the petitioner

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10122 of 2016 (3) dt.12-05-2016 2/2 submits that during the investigation it has surfaced that actually the petitioner and the deceased had reconciled and he on her death had come over there and performed last rite of the deceased. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner further tried to draw the attention of this Court to certain paragraphs in order to demonstrate the aforesaid facts.

However, such matter shall be considered at the time of his surrender as these facts were also available at the time of earlier bail application for consideration. In view of the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner as the same being not maintainable.

(Anjana Mishra, J) AnilKrSinha/- U