← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28245/2017disposed

Amit Kumar @ Anil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-18Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28245 of 2017 (4) dt.18-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.28245 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -270 Year- 2015 Thana -BARHARA District- BHOJPUR ======================================================

1. Amit Kumar @ Anil Kumar Son of Jagdish Singh, resident of VillageGyanpur Semariya, Police Station- Barhara, District- Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Upendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-09-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Barhara P.S. Case No. 270 of 2015, registered for offences punishable under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of Indian Penal Code as well as charge has been framed under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner is husband of the deceased and allegation against the petitioner is of causing dowry death of the deceased. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in this case uptil now seven witnesses have been examined and none of them have made any allegation against the petitioner and only five witnesses are left to be examined and petitioner has been in judicial custody for more than eight months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28245 of 2017 (4) dt.18-09-2017 Having heard both sides, considering the fact and circumstances of the case, this application is disposed of with direction to the court below to expedite the trial and try to conclude it within a period of four months and if the trial is not concluded within the aforesaid period, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail in the trial court itself and if any such application is filed, the trial court after considering the materials available on record as well as the evidences of witnesses, shall pass an appropriate order, without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T