Vinod Singh @ Vinod Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.340 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -30 Year- 2017 Thana -BADHAILA District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Vinod Singh @ Vinod Kumar Singh S/o Late Barak Singh, R/o VillageBishunpur, P.S.- Baghaila, District- Rohtas. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwari For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the "SC/ST Act") against the refusal of prayer for anticipatory bail by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (S.C./S.T.), Rohtas at Sasaram in Baghaila P.S. Case No. 30 of 2017 registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 448, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Sections 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act. The allegation of commission of injury with dagger is against co-accused Guddu Sharma. The occurrence, allegedly, took place inside the house. No overt act is alleged against the appellant.

Hence, let the appellant, above named, in the event of

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.340 of 2018 (2) dt.16-02-2018 2/2 his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as condition that the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation and trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant. Accordingly, this appeal stands allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T