Bibhash Kumar Singh @ Bibhu Singh @ Vibhu Singh @ Vibhesh Kr. Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13405 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2024 Thana- UDAKISHUNGANJ DistrictMadhepura ====================================================== Bibhash Kumar Singh @ Bibhu Singh @ Vibhu Singh @ Vibhesh Kr. Singh Son of Dilip Singh Resident of Village - Shahajadpur,Ward No. 4, P.S. Udakishunganj, Distt.- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Ramanand Mandal Son of Bachhan Mandal Resident of VillageDhoraypatti, Shahjadpur, Ward No. 4, P.S.- Udakishunganj, Distt.- Madhepura ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Raghwendra Pratap Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Parmanand Prasad, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-05-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363 and 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that his minor daughter aged about 16 years, at 01:00 a.m., on 27.05.2024 went to attend the call of nature but did not return as such a search was made when it transpired that petitioner kidnapped the victim with a view to marry her.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13405 of 2025(3) dt.12-05-2025 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that age of the victim was assessed by the Doctor in between 17-19 years and no mark of injury was found. It is next submitted that there was a dispute relating to plucking of Mango from the orchard of petitioner for which the petitioner has slept the victim. It is also submitted that even the case has been compromised between the parties.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Udakishunganj P.S. Case No. 174 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T