Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority v. M/S Sain Glass And Plastic Pvt. Ltd.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.495 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.25808 of 2019 ====================================================== 1.

Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority through the Managing Director, Udyog Bhawan, Gandhi Maidan, Patna. 2.

Managing Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Udyog Bhawan, Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

M/s Sain Glass and Plastic Pvt. Ltd. Industrial Area, Dona, Darbhanga through its Director, Tapeshwar Roy, aged about 69 years, Male, son of Late Suraj Roy, Gram Behat, P.O. Kabir Chak, P.S. Behat Sadar, Darbhanga. 2.

Tapeshwar Roy, son of Late Suraj Roy, Director of M/s Sain Glass and Plastic (Pvt.) Limited, Gram Behat, P.O. Kabir Chak, P.S. Behat Sadar, Darbhanga. 3.

Bihar State Credit and Investment Corporation Limited (Government of Bihar Undertaking), Indira Bhawan (4th Floor), Ram Charitra Singh Path, Patna through its Managing Director.

4.

Managing Director, Bihar State Credit and Investment Corporation Limited (Government of Bihar Undertaking), Indira Bhawan (4th Floor), Ram Charitra Singh Path, Patna. 5.

Manager, Bihar State Credit and Investment Corporation Limited (Government of Bihar Undertaking), Indira Bhawan (4th Floor), Ram Charitra Singh Path, Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Anand Kumar, Advocate Mr. Rajan Prakash, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 07-03-2024 None appears for the petitioners.

2. The present petition is filed for modification of order dated 21.07.2022 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 25808 of 2019.

Patna High Court MJC No.495 of 2023(2) dt.07-03-2024 2/2 Modification of any order of the Court is permissible if there are any typographical error. In the present case, in paragraph Nos. 3 & 4, petitioners are seeking for various modifications. Therefore, modification petition is not maintainable.

3. Accordingly, petition stands dismissed reserving liberty to the petitioners to file Review Petition. (P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Alok Kumar Pandey, J) manish/- U