Jaylal Yadav @ Jaylal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13841 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-136 Year-2024 Thana- MADHWAPUR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Jaylal Yadav @ Jaylal Kumar S/O Raghunath Ray R/O- Kurhar, P.SBhokhara, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 28-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Madhwapur P.S. Case No. 136 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 274, 275 3(5) of B.N.S. and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that total 105.27 liters liquor was recovered from motorcycle. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged against him and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner has no knowledge and concern with the alleged recovery. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is submitted that motorcycle in question does not belong to the petitioner. It is further submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13841 of 2025(2) dt.28-02-2025 2/2 that the name of the petitioner has transpired on the confessional statement of apprehended co-accused person namely, Bundel Kumar. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S. Other co-accused has been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 05.02.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 4588 of 2025. 5.

On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6.

Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Madhwapur P.S. Case No. 136 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Ranjan/- U T