Vivek Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9999 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -238 Year- 2015 Thana -LAURIYA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== Vivek Pandey son of Ajay Pandey resident of village - Ramauli, Police Station - Lauriya, District - West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Kr.Uday Pratap(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-03-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Lauria P.S. Case No. 238 of 2015 registered for offences under sections 420, 406, 409 of the Indian Penal Code. An allegation has been made that the petitioner, Dhobani PACS Chairman, has defalcated in depositing the money to the National Central Cooperative Bank which led to filing of present application.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner will deposit 50% of the amount within a period of four weeks from today and rest of the amount after proper calculation will be deposited in six equal installments

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9999 of 2016 (2) dt.03-03-2016 fixed by the Bank Manager.

In view of the undertaking given by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court would direct for release of the petitioner, namely, Vivek Pandey on bail in the event he would surrender within a period of four weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Lauriya P.S. Case No. 238 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

It is made clear that in case of failure of deposit of the aforesaid amount, the bail granted to the petitioner today shall be deemed to have been cancelled.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- U T