Ram Das @ Ram Das Sah @ Ramdash Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12581 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-577 Year-2025 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ram Das @ Ram Das Sah @ Ramdash Sah S/o Bahalu Das Residetn of Village- Yadopur Nankar, P.S.- Dhaka, District- East Champaran, Motihari ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate Mr. Dhandev Kumar, Advocate Ms. Isha Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 09-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 577 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 336(3), 338, 340(2), 317(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that five bikes were recovered from the house of this petitioner. The prosecution alleges that these bikes are stolen.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that from perusal of the seizure list, it will

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12581 of 2026(2) dt.09-03-2026 2/2 transpire that the witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel and the police have not complied with Section 105 of the BNSS while making the seizure. He further submits that in any view of the matter, the only allegation against the petitioner is that of receiving the stolen property, which is triable by the magistrate. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 14.10.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner has got one criminal antecedent.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Dhaka, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 577 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T