Ranjan Singh @ Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18292 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2023 Thana- CHERIYA BARIYARPUR DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== 1.
Ranjan Singh @ Ranjan Kumar S/o Vijay Singh R/o Vill - Bikrampur, Ward No. - 11, P.S. - Cheriya Bariyarpur, Dist. - Begusarai 2.
Raja Pandit @ Raja Kumar S/o Sandesh Pandit @ Sandesh Jha R/o Vill - Bikrampur, Ward No. - 11, P.S. - Cheriya Bariyarpur, Dist. - Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-04-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 324, 307, 452, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that the informant alleges that Ranjan Singh had assaulted him with sword causing injury over his forehead. It is next submitted that as far as Raja Pandit is concerned, there is no specific allegation of assault against him. The learned counsel next draws the attention of the Court to Annexure-2 to the anticipatory bail application to submit that the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature. It is also submitted
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18292 of 2024(2) dt.02-04-2024 2/2 that from bare reading of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that there is previous land dispute between the petitioners and the informant. It is also submitted that though allegation against petitioner no. 1 is of assaulting the injured by sword but then from the perusal of the injury report, it manifests that the injury was caused by hard and blunt substance.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bariyarpur (Cheriya Bariyarpur) P.S. Case No. 101 of 2023 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T