← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14105/2015disposed

Ajit Yadav @ Ajit Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2015-04-06Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14105 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -136 Year- 2014 Thana -LAXMIPUR District- JAMUI ====================================================== Ajit Yadav @ Ajit Kumar Yadav Son of Ganesh Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-04-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323/324/307/341/504/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that in the background of fight between the children of both sides, on the order of co-accused Ganesh Yadav, Ashok Yadav assaulted on the head of husband of the informant with iron rod and when informant went to rescue her husband this petitioner assaulted on the head of the informant with an axe. The injury has been found to be grievous.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has no intention to kill the informant and the informant has subsequently retracted from his initial version and filed a petition to that effect before the learned court below.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14105 of 2015 (2) dt.06-04-2015 2/2 Moreover, the petitioner claims himself to be a juvenile. The aforesaid facts constitute good ground for consideration of prayer for regular bail.

Let the learned Court below consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner, if the petitioner surrenders within a period of six weeks in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No.136 of 2014, pending before the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jamui.

So far as the petitioner, who himself claims to be a juvenile may avail the remedy available under "The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000" in accordance with law.

With the above observation, this application is, accordingly, disposed off.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Ashwini/- U T