Lalmohan Ram @ Lal Mohan Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13050 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-867 Year-2022 Thana- SIKARPUR District- West Champaran ====================================================== LALMOHAN RAM @ LAL MOHAN RAM Son of Nagender Ram @ Chait Ram R/V- Siyarahi, P.S- Shikarpur, Dist- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Anil Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 16-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of killing the daughter of the informant, due to nonfulfillment of further dowry demand. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13050 of 2023(3) dt.16-05-2023 2/3 dirty village politics. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is the husband of the deceased and good sense has been prevailed between the parties. There is no any prior complaint regarding assaulting, harassment and torturing to the deceased against the petitioner and others. The deceased was reluctant in living with the petitioner, since the petitioner is an exponent of well being of the parents but the informant is rapscallion, who always used to instigate her daughter to live separately and to enjoy free life, for which the deceased became rigid and obstinate and lastly she lost her temperament and committed suicide and it also appears from Postmortem report, that cause of death was Asphyxia due to hanging. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 19.11.2022.
The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M.,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13050 of 2023(3) dt.16-05-2023 3/3 Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Sikarpur P.S. Case No. 867 of 2022.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T