← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/366/2022disposed

Sanjay Kumar Mehta, v. The State Of Bihar

2023-03-15Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.366 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13964 of 2021 ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar Mehta, S/o Madhu Sudan Prasad Mehta, Resident of VillageMadhopur, P.O.-Banauli (Madhopur), P.S.-Simari, District-Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Amir Subhani, presently posted as the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Sri Vijay Kumar Vidhuri, presently posted as the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

Mr. K. K. Shidharth, presently posted as the Special Secretary, Department of Revenue, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Mr. S.K. Sharma, presently posted as the Joint Secretary, Department of Revenue, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5.

Mr. Manish Kumar, presently posted as the Commissioner, Darbhanga Commissionary, District-Darbhanga.

6.

Mr. Rajiv Raushan, presently posted as the Collector, District-Darbhanga. 7.

Mr. Abhishekh Kumar, presently posted as the Additional Collector (Est), District-Darbhanga.

8.

Choudhary Basant Kumar Singh, presently posted as the Circle Officer, Anchal-Singhwara, District-Darbhanga.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sajid Salim Khan (SC-25) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL ORDER 15-03-2023 In the present M.J.C., 6th supplementary show cause is filed on behalf of respondents along with supplementary affidavit, Annexure-M is enclosed while determining the backwages from November, 2020 till 4th July, 2022 in a lumpsum of Rs. 1,95,650/-. Such a calculation sheet is with reference to resolution passed from time to time in the year 2020, 2021 and

Patna High Court MJC No.366 of 2022(11) dt.15-03-2023 2/2 2022 respectively. Therefore, there is compliance. Learned counsel for the petitioner disputed the calculation. In such an event he is permitted to question the validity of Annexure-M to the 6th supplementary show cause dated 07.11.2022 in so far as calculation and disbursement of amount in a separate proceedings.

Accordingly, the present M.J.C. stands dropped. (P. B. Bajanthri, J) rakhi/- U