Rakesh Ray v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15250 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-417 Year-2025 Thana- DESARI District- Vaishali ====================================================== Rakesh Ray S/O Rajendra Ray Village- Ibrahimpur Sridarshan, Ward No. 4, Bajitpur Chak Kasturi, P.S.- Desari (Sahdei), District- Vaishali at Hajipur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 15901 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-417 Year-2025 Thana- DESARI District- Vaishali ====================================================== Anandi Ray Son of Late Maheshwar Ray Resident of Village- Kathauliya, P.S.- Bidupur, District- Vaishali at Hajipur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 15250 of 2026) For the Petitioner/s :
Ms.Sudha, Advocate Md. Nishad Alam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms.Asha Devi, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 15901 of 2026) For the Petitioner/s :
Ms.Sudha, Advocate Md. Nishad Alam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms.Asha Devi, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 12-03-2026 Heard Ms. Sudha, learned counsel for the petitioners duly assisted by Md. Nishad Alam for the petitioners and the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in connection with Desari P.S. Case No. 417 of 2025 instituted under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 109(1), 118(1), 351(2), 351(3), 352 of the BNS and section 25(g) of the Arms Act lodged on 22.11.2025 by the informant, Munshi Sharma.
3. As per the prosecution story, the accused persons
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15250 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026 2/2 armed variously came and firstly Anandi Rai tried to open fire which did not work. Later, both the petitioners gave iron rod blow which caused grievous injury to the informant. Earlier also they tried to put the house on fire which led to Sahdei P.S. Case No. 107 of 2017.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the informant is a tenant, rent was not being given to them when they persuaded the informant to pay rent, the FIR.
5. Learned APP representing in both the cases on the other hand has taken this Court to learned Sessions Judge order to show that the injuries inflicted by these two petitioners have been found to be grievous in nature.
6. Considering the allegation that has come coupled with the observation of the learned Sessions Judge where the injuries have been found to be grievous in nature, no relief can be extended.
7. The anticipatory bail application of the two petitioners stand rejected.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U T