Manjoo Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15514 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-162 Year-2018 Thana- KALUAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Manjoo Devi Wife of Daya Ram Paswan, Resident of Village - Dokhar, P.S. - Kaluahi, Distt - Madhubani.

2.

Arhuliya Devi Wife of Titir Paswan, Resident of Village - Dokhar, P.S. - Kaluahi, Distt - Madhubani.

3.

Matkur Paswan @ Jalal Paswan Son of Rameshwar Paswan, Resident of Village - Dokhar, P.S. - Kaluahi, Distt - Madhubani. 4.

Rambaboo Paswan Son of late Jagnoo Paswan, Resident of Village - Dokhar, P.S. - Kaluahi, Distt - Madhubani.

5.

Suraj Dev Paswan Son of late Aasho Paswan, Resident of Village - Dokhar, P.S. - Kaluahi, Distt - Madhubani.

6.

Indradev Paswan Son of late Aasho Paswan, Resident of Village - Dokhar, P.S. - Kaluahi, Distt - Madhubani.

7.

Maheshwar Paswan Son of Mishri Paswan, Resident of Village - Dokhar, P.S. - Kaluahi, Distt - Madhubani.

8.

Ramnath Paswan Son of late Amiri Paswan, Resident of Village - Dokhar, P.S. - Kaluahi, Distt - Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Soban Asghar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 13-03-2019 Heard both sides.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Kaluahi P.S. Case No.162 of 2018 registered under Sections 272, 273 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

The informant being police official got information

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15514 of 2019(2) dt.13-03-2019 2/2 that the petitioners were indulged in preparation and selling of illicit liquor and on such raid was conducted in the houses of petitioners, from there country made liquor and articles meant for preparation of liquor were recovered.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. Only some articles meant for preparation of liquor and some quantity of liquor were recovered from the houses, but taking into consideration the fact that from the houses of petitioners liquor and other utensils used for preparing liquor were recovered, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Harish/- U T