Mehadi Hassan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.15830 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -122 Year- 2017 Thana -GOPALPUR District- GOPALGANJ ====================================================== Mehadi Hassan, Son of Mir Hasan Miya, Resident of Village- Rampur Jaga, Police Station- Gopalpur, District- Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arbind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anant Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-03-2018 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection with Gopalpur P.S.Case No. 122 of 2017 registered under Sections 414/34 of the Indian penal Code.
Allegation in brief is that on the confessional statement of co-accused Pappu Yadav, stolen motorcycles were recovered from the possession of different accused including the petitioner. Submission is that Pappu Yadav, who made confessional statement relating to recovery of the stolen motorcycle, was granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 14.12.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 58798 of 2017 and so called recovery is from the joint house of the petitioner and he has no criminal antecedent and seeks bail on the ground of parity as
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15830 of 2018 (2) dt.22-03-2018 2/2 Pappu Yadav has been granted bail from whose possession also stolen motorcycle was recovered.
Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner, namely, Mehadi Hassan, is directed to be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-XI, Gopalganj in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 122 of 2017 with condition that one of the bailor must be his close family member. Petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every date during trial and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without any reasonable ground, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled. (Arun Kumar, J) Sujit/- U T