Raushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13185 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-827 Year-2024 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Raushan Kumar S/o- Kamlesh Yadav @ Kamlesh Prasad Village- Devchand Bigha PS- Kako Distt- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Paras Nath, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-06-2025 Heard Paras Nath, learned counsel for the petitioner and Satya Nand Shukla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Jehanabad P.S.Case No.827 of 2024, FIR dated 22.10.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 64 and 127(3) of B.N.S. 2023.
3.The allegation against the petitioner is of confining the informant for four days in a room and of forcibly establishing physical relationship with her.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case and allegation as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13185 of 2025(4) dt.30-06-2025 2/2 any offence as alleged in the FIR.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State, on the other hand, on the basis of materials available on the record and the case diary, has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that from a bare perusal of the FIR it appears that there is direct and specific allegation against the petitioner that he has committed rape upon the victim. Apart from that, the statement of victim was recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C./183 of B.N.S.S., in which she has categorically stated that the petitioner has committed rape upon her.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 827 of 2024 pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad.
7. Prayer is refused.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) anand/- U T