← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13529/2026bail granted

Ranjeet Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2026-06-24Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13529 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2025 Thana- GADHPURA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Ranjeet Yadav Son of Ram Uday Yadav Resident of Village- Bhansi, P.S.- Garhpura, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Prerna Anand, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Suman Kumari Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 24-06-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Garhpura P.S. Case No. 108 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections126(2), 115(2), 352, 109(1), 191(2), 351(2) of the B.N.S. lodged on 27.09.2025 by the informant, Rajiv Kumar Singh.

3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that the named accused persons intercepted his son and assaulted, this included Chandan Paswan who have blow on the head/ears and to his son while Bambam Paswan assaulted Dhiraj Mahto as he tried to rescue his son, the motorcycle was also damaged by them. This led to the F.I.R.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that neither he has criminal antecedent nor named in the F.I.R., allegation in the F.I.R. clearly show that Chandan Paswan and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13529 of 2026(4) dt.24-06-2026 2/3 Bambam Paswan and Dhiraj Mahto assaulted his son respectively, injuries have been found to be simple in nature but only to implicate, later in his restatement, petitioner has been named.

5. Learned APP opposes the prayer submitting that in his restatement the informant has also named in this petition

6. Considering the submission of the parties as also that he do not have criminal antecedent, no role has been assigned to him in the F.I.R., in that background, this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in connection with Gharpura P.S. Case No. 108 of 2025 subject to the following conditions:- (i) one of the bailor should be the family member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official document (Aadhar Card/Voter Id/Driving License/Pan Card) to show his/her bona fide;

(ii) the petitioner shall be appearing before the Police

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13529 of 2026(4) dt.24-06-2026 3/3 Station as and when required for cooperating in the investigation;

(iii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/her bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

(iv) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned police station every month for next six months to mark his attendance and at the end of the period a certificate be submitted before the Trial Court failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds; (v) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;

(vi) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds. (Rajiv Roy, J) munindra/- U T